|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Section Contents |
Preparation of Rare Earth GlassesSummaryThe finished glass contains SiO2, Rare Earth (R.E) oxide (generally RE2O3), CaO and Al2O3.The gels were made in a similar manner to that described in Biggar and O'Hara (1969). The gel starting materials were prepared by mixing the required weights of standard solutions of aluminium, calcium and rare earth nitrates to produce a final weight of either 5g or 10g. Ethanol was then added to the nitrate mixture. This was to ensure the miscibility of tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS Si(OC2H5)4), used for the silica component, which was added next. Concentrated ammonia (0.88vol NH4OH) was then added to form a gelatinous precipitate of hydroxides. The mixture was then covered and left for at least 16 hours to ensure the complete hydrolysis of the TEOS. The gels were then slowly dried, starting at 70oC and increasing the temperature slowly over several days to 180oC in an oven. This was followed by heating to around 400oC and finally roasting at 900oC. When dry, the gels were ground up finely, placed in a large platinum crucible and fused using furnaces at around 1420-1550oC. They were then quenched in ice water. The fusions were carried out in controlled atmospheric conditions when required. Due to the small crucible size the fusion had to be done in several batches. Different oxides underwent a different number of fusions depending on the homogeneity after each fusion. If the homogeneity could be improved by further fusion the batches were bulked, ground and re-fused. This process could be repeated up to 5 times A detailed description of the Gel making process can be downloaded (by Elizabeth Cairnes) GEL STARTING MATERIALS
RARE EARTH SOLUTIONSWith the exception of cerium, all of the rare earth solutions used were obtained by dissolving the corresponding rare earth oxide. In the case of cerium, (NH4)2Ce(NO3)6 was used. The rare earth solutions were prepared by first igniting the oxides at 900oC for around 2 hours. When cool, the required amount was weighed accurately into a 250ml beaker and enough water added to cover the powder. This was followed by the addition of concentrated HNO3 to dissolve the R.E. oxide. The mixture was heated on a hotplate until the oxide was completely dissolved and then the beaker was transferred to a steam bath. The solution was evaporated to dryness. The resultant R.E. nitrates were taken up in water and a small amount of 50% HNO3 added (1ml to a 10g batch). The solution was then diluted to the required concentration. The (NH4)2Ce(NO3)6 solution was prepared by 'drying' the crystals at 110oC overnight and dissolving in water with 10ml concentrated HNO3. This solution was then transferred quantitatively to a volumetric flask and made up to the mark with water. ALUMINIUM SOLUTIONThe Aluminium solution was prepared by accurately weighing the required amount of dry aluminium powder into a 250ml conical flask and adding enough water to cover. Next, around 120ml of a 33 % (approx.) solution of HNO3 was dripped slowly and with stirring onto the mixture. When reaction had ceased, the temperature of the bath was set to 4OoC and then gradually increased, in 10 degree stages, to 95oC. When the aluminium powder was completely dissolved, the cooled solution was transferred quantitatively to a volumetric flask. CALCIUM SOLUTION |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Element |
R.E |
Si |
Ca |
Al |
O |
|
Lanthanum |
14.15 |
26.08 |
12.20 |
5.57 |
41.99 |
|
Cerium (III) |
16.83 |
25.11 |
11.75 |
5.63 |
40.68 |
|
Praseodymium |
13.90 |
26.19 |
12.25 |
5.59 |
42.06 |
|
Neodymium |
14.48 |
25.99 |
12.16 |
5.55 |
41.81 |
|
Samarium |
17.42 |
22.70 |
13.89 |
6.25 |
39.74 |
|
Dysprosium |
18.56 |
22.38 |
13.73 |
6.15 |
39.19 |
|
Gadolinium |
18.09 |
22.51 |
13.79 |
6.20 |
39.42 |
|
Yttrium |
11.00 |
24.46 |
15.01 |
6.72 |
42.81 |
|
Terbium* |
19.36 |
21.78 |
13.85 |
6.20 |
38.79 |
|
Erbium* |
19.87 |
21.15 |
14.26 |
6.40 |
38.33 |
|
Holmium* |
19.00 |
22.03 |
13.85 |
6.20 |
38.92 |
|
Ytterbium* |
19.62 |
21.98 |
13.64 |
6.12 |
38.64 |
|
Europium* |
19.94 |
19.60 |
15.54 |
7.01 |
37.91 |
|
Thulium* |
22.87 |
17.44 |
16.28 |
7.30 |
36.11 |
|
Lutetium |
19.62 |
22.11 |
16.51 |
6.08 |
38.68 |
*Recalculated values as some of the gels produced gave yields of less than the theoretical values. The most likely explanation for this is evaporation of non-hydrolysed TEOS. The compositions of these gels have been recalculated to take this into account.
|
Element |
R.E Oxide |
SiO2 |
CaO |
Al2O3 |
|
Lanthanum |
16.60 |
55.80 |
17.07 |
10.52 |
|
Cerium (III) |
19.71 |
53.72 |
16.44 |
10.13 |
|
Praseodymium |
16.27 |
56.02 |
17.14 |
10.56 |
|
Neodymium |
16.89 |
55.59 |
17.02 |
10.49 |
|
Samarium |
20.20 |
48.55 |
19.44 |
11.81 |
|
Dysprosium |
21.30 |
47.87 |
19.21 |
11.63 |
|
Gadolinium |
20.85 |
48.16 |
19.29 |
11.71 |
|
Yttrium |
13.97 |
52.33 |
21.0 |
12.70 |
|
Terbium* |
22.28 |
46.60 |
19.38 |
11.74 |
|
Erbium* |
22.75 |
45.24 |
19.95 |
12.10 |
|
Holmium* |
21.77 |
47.13 |
19.38 |
11.72 |
|
Ytterbium* |
22.34 |
47.02 |
19.08 |
11.56 |
|
Europium* |
23.09 |
41.93 |
21.74 |
13.24 |
|
Thulium* |
26.12 |
37.30 |
22.78 |
13.80 |
|
Lutetium |
22.31 |
47.29 |
18.91 |
11.49 |
* Recalculated values as some of the gels produced gave yields of less than the theoretical values. The most likely explanation for this is evaporation of non-hydrolysed TEOS. The compositions of these gels have been recalculated to take this into account.
References
Biggar (G.M) and O'Hara(M.J) 1969- A comparison of gel and glass starting materials for phase equilibrium studies, Mineralogical Magazine, June 1969, Vol 37, No 286